Search a Bible verse · Source library · Sources and text rights

Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew — Historical footnotes

Homily 17

Complete historical editorial footnotes. These notes retain the original edition’s wording; individual note authors are unspecified.

English translation and editorial credits: Sir George Prevost, M. B. Riddle.

Read the original source · Text reuse terms

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

τ συνοκου παρθνου, they were often called συνεισακτο. The practice of unmarried men, especially of the clergy, having single young women in their houses, is a frequent object of warning and censure both in the Homilies of the Fathers and in Church Canons. The earliest mention of such a thing, and of the sad abuse consequent on it, appears to be in St. Irenæus, i. 6, 3: who lays it to the charge of the Valentinian heretics. Tertullian (de Jejun. ad fin.) imputes it to the Catholics. St. Cyprian’s fourth Epistle (ed. Fell.) was written to repress and punish an instance of it in the Church of Carthage. It was one of the charges against Paul of Samosata, and was forbidden by the third canon of Nicæa. See Dr. Routh’s Reliquiæ Sacræ, 2,506, to which the editor is indebted for this note. The custom seems to have prevailed particularly at Antioch, ib. 482. See also an oration of Chrysostom on this subject, vi. 214.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-7 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

What now can they say, who have those virgin inmates? Why, by the tenor of this law they must be guilty of ten thousand adulteries, daily beholding them with desire. For this cause the blessed Jobalso laid down this law from the beginning, blocking out from himself on all sides this kind of gazing.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[The words in italics are a translation of the Latin version; nothing corresponding to these terms occurs in the Greek text of the Homily.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-12 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

But if thou desirest to hear also His rebuke for them in particular, listen to Isaiah,in many words inveighing against them, and deriding their habit, their aspect, their gait, their trailing garments, their tripping feet, their drooping necks. Hear with him the blessed Paulalso, setting many laws for them; and both about garments, and ornaments of gold,and plaiting of hair, and luxuriousliving, and all other such things, vehemently rebuking this sex. And Christ too, by what follows next, obscurely intimated this very same; for when He saith, “pluck out and cut off the eye that offendeth thee,” He speaks as indicating His anger against them.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[The text has simply τν σκανδαλζοντα. The precept is thus made more general.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-14 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

But if thou desirest to hear also His rebuke for them in particular, listen to Isaiah,in many words inveighing against them, and deriding their habit, their aspect, their gait, their trailing garments, their tripping feet, their drooping necks. Hear with him the blessed Paulalso, setting many laws for them; and both about garments, and ornaments of gold,and plaiting of hair, and luxuriousliving, and all other such things, vehemently rebuking this sex. And Christ too, by what follows next, obscurely intimated this very same; for when He saith, “pluck out and cut off the eye that offendeth thee,” He speaks as indicating His anger against them.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

ββλιον ποστασου, St. Chrys. Comp. Mark x. 4: ἀποστσιον, rec. Text. [There is no variation in the text of Matthew here, but in verse 32 the best authorities read π πολωνὃς ν πολσ, as in text. rec.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-19 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

4. “Now it hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement. But I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery; and whosoever marrieth her that is put away, committeth adultery.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[ἀσθενστερον γρ γυν. The translator paraphrases this as above, giving an unnecessary tone of depreciation to the language.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-26 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

And if He discourse not at all unto her concerning these things, marvel not; for the woman is rather a weak creature. For this cause letting her go, in his threatening against the men He fully corrects her remissness. Just as if any one who had a prodigal child, leaving him, should rebuke those who make him such, and forbid them to have intercourse, or to approach him. And if that be galling, call to mind, I pray thee, His former sayings, on what terms He had blessed His hearers; and thou wilt see that it is very possible and easy. For he that is meek, and a peacemaker, and poor in spirit, and merciful, how shall he cast out his wife? He that is used to reconcile others, how shall he be at variance with her that is his own?

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Jer. ii. 10, 11. [The citation is much abbreviated from the LXX., which does not vary materially from the Hebrew.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-40 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

For since you are not persuaded out of the Scriptures, I am compelled to shame you by them that are without. This God also did unto the Jews, when He said, “Go ye forth unto the Isles of Chittim, and send unto Kedar, and know if nations will change their gods; which yet are no gods.” And to the brutes likewise He sends us oftentimes, saying on this wise, “Go to the ant, thou sluggard, and emulate her ways:” and “go forth to the bee.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Prov. vi. 6–8, LXX. “Or go to the bee, and learn how industrious she is, and how honorable she maketh her work; whose labors kings and private men make use of for health: and she is desirable to all and glorious, although she be weak in strength; for holding wisdom precious she is preferred.” [This is the addition to Prov. vi. 8, found in the LXX., but not in the Vulgate.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-41 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

For since you are not persuaded out of the Scriptures, I am compelled to shame you by them that are without. This God also did unto the Jews, when He said, “Go ye forth unto the Isles of Chittim, and send unto Kedar, and know if nations will change their gods; which yet are no gods.” And to the brutes likewise He sends us oftentimes, saying on this wise, “Go to the ant, thou sluggard, and emulate her ways:” and “go forth to the bee.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[ἑαυτν συνειαγαγεν .]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-3 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Wherefore it is worth inquiring too, why He did not begin with that. Why was it then? Because, had He begun from thence, He must have enlarged it also, and have brought in Himself together with His Father.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[οκτι σχοντε, “no longer having strength.”—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-9 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

For in truth greater is the struggle on beholding, and not possessing the object of fondness: nor is the pleasure so great which we reap from the sight, as the mischief we undergo from increasing this desire; thus making our opponent strong, and giving more scope to the devil, and no longerable to repulse him, now that we have brought him into our inmost parts, and have thrown our mind open unto him. Therefore He saith, “commit no adultery with thine eyes, and thou wilt commit none with thy mind.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

See Num. xxx. 2; Deut. xxiii. 23.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-28 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

But what means, “Thou shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths?” It is this, “thou shalt be true in swearing.” “But I say unto you, swear not at all.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Isa. lxxvi. 1; Ps. xlviii. 2.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-29 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Next, to lead them farther away from swearing by God, He saith, “Neither by Heaven, for it is God’s throne, nor by the earth, for it is the footstool of His feet; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King:”still speaking out of the prophetical writings, and signifying Himself not to be opposed to the ancients. This was because they had a custom of swearing by these objects, and he intimates this custom near the end of his Gospel.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Jer. iv. 2. LXX. κα μσ, Ζ Κριο, μετ ληθεα ν, κρσει, κα ν δικαιοσν.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-33 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

But if the old law had belonged to the devil, it would not have led people away from idolatry, but rather would have drawn them on and cast them into it; for this did the devil desire. But now we see the opposite effect produced by the old law. And indeed this very thing, the oath, was ordained of old for this cause, that they might not swear by the idols. For “ye shall swear,” saith He, “by the true God.” They were then no small advantages which the law effected, but rather very great. For that they came unto the “strong meat,” was the work of its care.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

He clearly alludes to the history of Demosthenes.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-39 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Consider, for example, how among the Greeks, in many instances, persons lisping have entirely cured by much practice their halting tongue; while others, who were used to shrug up their shoulders in an unseemly way, and to be continually moving them, by putting a sword over them, have broken themselves of it.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

See St. Chrys. on 1 Cor. Hom. IV. and the note there.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 17, editorial note cite_note-42 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

For perjury surely is no trifling mischief. If to swear is of the evil one, how great the penalty which false swearing will bring! Did ye give praise to what hath been said? Nay, I want not applause, nor tumults, nor noise. One thing only do I wish, that quietly and intelligently listening, you should do what is said. This is the applause, this the panegyric for me. But if thou praisest what I say, but doest not what thou applaudest, greater is the punishment, more aggravated the accusation: and to us it is shame and ridicule. For the things here present are no dramatic spectacle; neither do ye now sit gazing on actors, that ye may merely applaud. This place is a spiritual school. Wherefore also there is but one thing aimed at, duly to perform the things that have been spoken, and to show forth our obedience by our works. For then only shall we have obtained all. Since as things are,