It appears by this that St. Chrysostom did not consider Nathanael to be the same with St. Bartholomew.
Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 30, editorial note cite_note-6 · Original source
Search a Bible verse · Source library · Sources and text rights
Homily 30
Complete historical editorial footnotes. These notes retain the original edition’s wording; individual note authors are unspecified.
English translation and editorial credits: Sir George Prevost, M. B. Riddle.
Read the original source · Text reuse terms
It appears by this that St. Chrysostom did not consider Nathanael to be the same with St. Bartholomew.
Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 30, editorial note cite_note-6 · Original source
And wherefore can it be, one may say, that he hath not told us of the others also, how and in what manner they were called; but only of Peter and James, and John and Philip, and nowhere of the others?
κεχρσθαι το πομνοι, “to treat their followers.” The last editor thinks there is a designed play upon the words, by way of rhetorical turn, here.
Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 30, editorial note cite_note-39 · Original source
5. Then what He had done before, this He doth here again. I mean, that as He, when they were attempting to prove Him blameable for eating with sinners, proved to them on the contrary, that His proceeding was not only no blame, but an absolute praise to Him: so here too, when they wanted to show of Him, that He knows not how to manage His disciples, He signifies that such language was the part of men not knowing how to manage their inferences,but finding fault at random.
Matt. ix. 17: [R.V., “wine-skins.” Comp. the next paragraph.]
Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 30, editorial note cite_note-41 · Original source
“Neither do men put new wine into old bottles.”
[῾Ελλνων; see note on Homily XII. 5, p. 79.—R.]
Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 30, editorial note cite_note-45 · Original source
Together with these things remind her also of the women of old, of Sarah, of Rebecca, both of the fair and of them that were not so, and point out how all equally practised modesty. For even Leah, the wife of the patriarch, not being fair, was not constrained to devise any such thing, but although she were uncomely, and not very much beloved by her husband, she neither devised any such thing, nor marred her countenance, but continued to preserve the lineaments thereof undisfigured, and this though brought up by Gentiles.