Search a Bible verse · Source library · Sources and text rights

Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew — Historical footnotes

Homily 37

Complete historical editorial footnotes. These notes retain the original edition’s wording; individual note authors are unspecified.

English translation and editorial credits: Sir George Prevost, M. B. Riddle.

Read the original source · Text reuse terms

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[τ γνμη; “zeal” would be a better rendering, though there is no precise English equivalent.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-9 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Now what He said is like this: “woman hath not borne a greater than this man.” And His very sentence is indeed sufficient; but if thou art minded to learn from facts also, consider his table, his manner of life, the height of his soul. For he so lived as though he were in heaven: and having got above the necessities of nature, he travelled as it were a new way, spending all his time in hymns and prayers, and holding intercourse with none among men, but with God alone continually. For he did not so much as see any of his fellow-servants, neither was he seen by any one of them; he fed not on milk, he enjoyed not the comfort of bed, or roof, or market, or any other of the things of men; and yet he was at once mild and earnest. Hear, for example, how considerately he reasons with his own disciples, courageously with the people of the Jews, how openly with the king. For this cause He said also, “There hath not risen among them that are born of women a greater than John the Baptist.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

“Many will understand this of the Saviour; that he who is less in time is greater in dignity. But let us simply understand, that every Saint who is already with God is greater than he whose post is yet in the battle. For it is one thing to possess the crown of victory, another still to fight in the battle. Some will take it that the lowest angel serving God in Heaven is greater than any, even the first of men who as yet dwells on earth.” St. Jerome, in loco. “Finally, it is so utterly impossible that there should be any comparison between John and the Son of God, that the former is of less esteem even than the angels. Thus, on the one hand, inasmuch as He had called him an angel” (Mal. iii. 1), “He is of course set above men; on the other, because he had declared him chief among those born of women, He therefore added, For he who is lesser in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he: that you might know he could not compare with the angels.” St. Ambr. on St. Luke, vii. 27; St. Aug. Contr. Advers. Legis et Proph. ii. xx, states both interpretations, without any preference for either. But in his 13 Tract. on St. John, c. ii. he gives the same as St. Chrysostom.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-19 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Now some affirm, that Christ said this of the apostles, others again, of angels. Thus, when any have turned aside from the truth, they are wont to wander many ways. For what sort of connexion hath it, to speak either of angels or of apostles? And besides, if He were speaking of the apostles, what hindered his bringing them forward by name? whereas, when He is speaking of Himself, He naturally conceals His person, because of the still prevailing suspicion, and that He may not seem to say anything great of Himself; yea, and we often find Him doing so.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

ἀφοσιομενο, “just saying, ‘God forgive me;’ just doing enough to come without scruple.” Vid. Suicer in verb. who quotes St. Chrys. on Ps. 41. “Let us not come in hither anyhow nor make our responses ἀφοσιομενοι, just well enough to keep off a curse” (i. 617, Sav.) Also Hom. XXIX. on Acts, t. iv. p. 777. “How may one form a judgment of a church? If we go away daily with some profit, great or small, not simply satisfying a rule and ἀφοσιομενοι, quitting ourselves of a scruple.” Again, ibid. “What we do, is turned into a mere regulation and ἀφοσωσι, a formal deprecation of a curse.” Cf. Isæus de Appollodori Hered. p. 185. Ed. Reiske, “not ἀφοσιομενο, but preparing himself as well as possible.”

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-43 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

8. Heardest thou not what Paul saith, “Rejoice in the Lord?” He said not, “in the devil.” When then wilt thou be able to hear Paul? when, to gain a sense of thy wrong actions? drunken as thou art, ever and incessantly, with the spectacle I was speaking of. For thy having come here is nothing wonderful nor great; or rather it is wonderful. For here thou comest any how, and so as just to satisfy a scruple,but there with diligence and speed, and great readiness. And it is evident from what thou bringest home, on returning thence.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

The women in plays were personated by men: those mentioned below were singers; the slave’s part is described in the next sentence.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-44 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

tumult, and the satanical cries, and the devilish gestures? For first one, being a young man, wears his hair long behind, and changing his nature into that of a woman, is striving both in aspect, and in gesture, and in garments, and generally in all ways, to pass into the likeness of a tender damsel. Then another who is grown old, in the opposite way to this, having his hair shaven, and with his loins girt about, his shame cut off before his hair, stands ready to be smitten with the rod, prepared both to say and do anything. The women again, their heads uncovered, stand without a blush, discoursing with a whole people, so complete is their practice in shamelessness; and thus pour forth all effrontery and impurity into the souls of their hearers. And their one study is, to pluck up all chastity from the foundations, to disgrace our nature, to satiate the desire of the wicked demon. Yea, and there are both foul sayings, and gestures yet fouler; and the dressing of the hair tends that way, and the gait, and apparel, and voice, and flexure of the limbs; and there are turnings of the eyes, and flutes, and pipes, and dramas, and plots; and all things, in short, full of the most extreme impurity. When then wilt thou be sober again, I pray thee, now that the devil is pouring out for thee so much of the strong wine of whoredom, mingling so many cups of unchastity? For indeed both adulteries and stolen marriages are there, and there are women playing the harlot, men prostituting, youths corrupting themselves: all there is iniquity to the full, all sorcery, all shame. Wherefore they that sit by should not laugh at these things, but weep and groan bitterly.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

[R.V., “but little;” Gr. “lesser.”]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-10 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Wherefore this also, in an unsuspected way, He corrects by saying, “He that is less,in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than he.” Less in age, and according to the opinion of the multitude, since they even called Him “a gluttonous man and a winebibber;”and, “Is not this the carpenter’s son?”and on every occasion they used to make light of Him.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Or, “by way of economy;” οκονομικ.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-16 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Or if we should even grant that this was said by Him in the way of comparison, this was done in condescension,because of the weakness of the hearers. For the men really had their gaze very much fixed upon John; and then he was rendered the more illustrious both by his imprisonment, and by his plainness of speech to the king; and it was a great point for the present, that even so much should be received among the multitude. And so too, the Old Testament uses in the same way to correct the souls of the erring, by putting together in a way of comparison things that cannot be compared; as when it saith, “Among the gods there is none like unto Thee, O Lord:”and again, “There is no god like our God.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Mal. iv. 5, 6 [LXX., but with “children” substituted for “son.”—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-22 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Then He states also another infallible sign, saying, “If ye will receive it, he is Elias, which was for to come.” For “I will send you,” it is said, “Elias the Tishbite, who shall turn the heart of the father to the children.” This man then is Elias, if ye attend exactly, saith He. For “I will send,” saith He, “my messenger before Thy face.”

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

See Ezek. iv. 5, 12, 13, 24, &c.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-32 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

And if the similitudes be mean, and of an ill sound, marvel not, for He was discoursing with a view to the weakness of His hearers. Since Ezekiel too mentions many similitudes like them, and unworthy of God’s majesty. But this too especially becomes His tender care.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

Ezek. xvi. 51. [The LXX. is not cited with verbal accuracy.—R.]

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-40 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

Thus elsewhere also He makes a comparison, condemning them by the Ninevites, and by the Queen of the south; there, however, it was by them that did right, here, even by them that sinned; a thing far more grievous. With this law of condemnation, Ezekiel too was acquainted: wherefore also he said to Jerusalem, “Thou hast justified thy sisters in all thy sins.” Thus everywhere is He wont to linger in the Old Testament, as in a favored place. And not even at this doth He stay His speech, but makes their fears yet more intense, by saying, that they should suffer things more grievous than Sodomites and Tyrians, so as by every means to gather them in, both by bewailing, and by alarming them.

1888 (historical English edition; physical printing year uncertain) | Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)

i.e., to tyrants, such as Pisistratus and others.

Editorial footnote · Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 37, editorial note cite_note-45 · Original source

Read the surrounding source paragraph

“What then? Are we to shut up the stage?” it will be said, “and are all things to be turned upside down at thy word?” Nay, but as it is, all things are turned upside down. For whence are they, tell me, that plot against our marriages? Is it not from this theatre? Whence are they that dig through into chambers? Is it not from that stage? Comes it not of this, when husbands are insupportable to their wives? of this, when the wives are contemptible to their husbands? of this, that the more part are adulterers? So that the subverter of all things is he that goes to the theatre; it is he that brings in a grievous tyranny. “Nay,” thou wilt say, “this is appointed by the good order of the laws.” Why, to tear away men’s wives, and to insult young boys, and to overthrow houses, is proper to those who have seized on citadels.“And what adulterer,” wilt thou say, “hath been made such by these spectacles?” Nay, who hath not been made an adulterer? And if one might but mention them now by name, I could point out how many husbands those harlots have severed from their wives, how many they have taken captive, drawing some even from the marriage bed itself, not suffering others so much as to live at all in marriage.