This may also be translated: “expounding the set of opinions prevalent in his day.”
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter II.—Testimonies to the unity of God., editorial note cite_note-5 · Original source
Search a Bible verse · Source library · Sources and text rights
Chapter II.—Testimonies to the unity of God.
Complete historical editorial footnotes. These notes retain the original edition’s wording; individual note authors are unspecified.
English translation and editorial credits: George Reith (historical edition translation credit; individual allocation qualified), Alexander Roberts (Edinburgh series editor), James Donaldson (Edinburgh series editor), Arthur Cleveland Coxe (American revision with prefaces and notes).
Read the original source · Text reuse terms
This may also be translated: “expounding the set of opinions prevalent in his day.”
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter II.—Testimonies to the unity of God., editorial note cite_note-5 · Original source
First, then, Æschylus, in expounding the arrangement of his work, expressed himself also as follows respecting the only God:—
Some propose to insert these three lines in the centre of the next quotation from Philemon, after the line, “Nay, there’s an eye,” etc.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter III.—Testimonies to a future judgment., editorial note cite_note-8 · Original source
“That time of times shall come, shall surely come, When from the golden ether down shall fall Fire’s teeming treasure, and in burning flames All things of earth and heaven shall be consumed; And then, when all creation is dissolved, The sea’s last wave shall die upon the shore, The bald earth stript of trees, the burning air No winged thing upon its breast shall bear. There are two roads to Hades, well we know; By this the righteous, and by that the bad, On to their separate fates shall tend; and He, Who all things had destroyed, shall all things save.”
Grotius joins these lines to the preceding. Clement of Alexandria assigns them, and the others, which are under the name of Euripides, to Diphilus.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter III.—Testimonies to a future judgment., editorial note cite_note-10 · Original source
And Euripides:—
The mss. are corrupt here. They seem to read, and one actually does read, “all” for “many.” “Many” is in Plato, and the clause in brackets is taken from Plato to fill up the sense.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter IV.—God desires not sacrifices, but righteousness., editorial note cite_note-13 · Original source
Again, Plato, in Timæus, says: “But if any one on consideration should actually institute a rigid inquiry, he would be ignorant of the distinction between the human and the divine nature; because God mingles many things up into one, [and again is able to dissolve one into many things,] seeing that He is endued with knowledge and power; but no man either is, or ever shall be, able to perform any of these.”
[See Warburton’s Divine Legation (book ii. § 4), vol. ii. p. 20. Ed. London, 1811.]
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter V.—The vain pretensions of false gods., editorial note cite_note-15 · Original source
“But in the daughter of Erechtheus What interest have I? for that pertains Not unto such as me. But when I come With golden vessels for libations, I The dew shall sprinkle, and yet needs must warn Apollo of his deeds; for when he weds Maidens by force, the children secretly Begotten he betrays, and then neglects When dying. Thus not you; but while you may Always pursue the virtues, for the gods Will surely punish men of wickedness. How is it right that you, who have prescribed Laws for men’s guidance, live unrighteously? But ye being absent, I shall freely speak, And ye to men shall satisfaction give For marriage forced, thou Neptune, Jupiter, Who over heaven presides. The temples ye Have emptied, while injustice ye repay. And though ye laud the prudent to the skies, Yet have ye filled your hands with wickedness. No longer is it right to call men ill If they do imitate the sins of gods; Nay, evil let their teachers rather be.”
Θεοῦ is omitted in mss., but μοναρχία of itself implies it.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter uncertain, editorial note cite_note-1 · Original source
Justin on the Sole Government of God
i.e., the doctrine that God only is to be worshipped.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter I.—Object of the author., editorial note cite_note-2 · Original source
Although human nature at first received a union of intelligence and safety to discern the truth, and the worship due to the one Lord of all, yet envy, insinuating the excellence of human greatness, turned men away to the making of idols; and this superstitious custom, after continuing for a long period, is handed down to the majority as if it were natural and true. It is the part of a lover of man, or rather of a lover of God, to remind men who have neglected it of that which they ought to know. For the truth is of itself sufficient to show forth, by means of those things which are contained under the pole of heaven, the order [instituted by] Him who has created them. But forgetfulness having taken possession of the minds of men, through the long-suffering of God, has acted recklessly in transferring to mortals the name which is applicable to the only true God; and from the few the infection of sin spread to the many, who were blinded by popular usage to the knowledge of that which was lasting and unchangeable. For the men of former generations, who instituted private and public rites in honour of such as were more powerful, caused forgetfulness of the Catholic faith to take possession of their posterity; but I, as I have just stated, along with a God-loving mind, shall employ the speech of one who loves man, and set it before those who have intelligence, which all ought to have who are privileged to observe the administration of the universe, so that they should worship unchangeably Him who knows all things. This I shall do, not by mere display of words, but by altogether using demonstration drawn from the old poetry in Greek literature, and from writings very common amongst all. For from these the famous men who have handed down idol-worship as law to the multitudes, shall be taught and convicted by their own poets and literature of great ignorance.
Grotius supposes this to be Æschylus the younger in some prologue.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter II.—Testimonies to the unity of God., editorial note cite_note-4 · Original source
First, then, Æschylus, in expounding the arrangement of his work, expressed himself also as follows respecting the only God:—
“Pythagorei cujusdam fetus.”—Otto, after Goezius.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter II.—Testimonies to the unity of God., editorial note cite_note-6 · Original source
He speaks indeed as if he had been an eyewitness of God’s greatness. And Pythagoras agrees with him when he writes:—
Some attribute these lines to Menander, others regard them as spurious.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter IV.—God desires not sacrifices, but righteousness., editorial note cite_note-11 · Original source
And that God is not appeased by the libations and incense of evil-doers, but awards vengeance in righteousness to each one, Philemon again shall bear testimony to me:—
The words from “but” to “all” are assigned by Otto to Justin, not to Menander.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter V.—The vain pretensions of false gods., editorial note cite_note-17 · Original source
“For I deem that which nourishes my life Is God; but he whose custom ’tis to meet The wants of men,—He needs not at our hands Renewed supplies, Himself being all in all.”
[N. B.—This tractate is probably the genuine work of Justin.]
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter VI.—We should acknowledge one only God., editorial note cite_note-20 · Original source
though he is a mortal. Æsculapius and Apollo are taught to heal by Chiron the Centaur,—a very novel thing indeed, for gods to be taught by a man. What need I speak of Bacchus, who the poet says is mad? or of Hercules, who he says is unhappy? What need to speak of Mars and Venus, the leaders of adultery; and by means of all these to establish the proof which has been undertaken? For if some one, in ignorance, should imitate the deeds which are said to be divine, he would be reckoned among impure men, and a stranger to life and humanity; and if any one does so knowingly, he will have a plausible excuse for escaping vengeance, by showing that imitation of godlike deeds of audacity is no sin. But if any one should blame these deeds, he will take away their well-known names, and not cover them up with specious and plausible words. It is necessary, then, to accept the true and invariable Name, not proclaimed by my words only, but by the words of those who have introduced us to the elements of learning, in order that we may not, by living idly in this present state of existence, not only as those who are ignorant of the heavenly glory, but also as having proved ourselves ungrateful, render our account to the Judge.
Literally, “history.”
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter I.—Object of the author., editorial note cite_note-3 · Original source
Although human nature at first received a union of intelligence and safety to discern the truth, and the worship due to the one Lord of all, yet envy, insinuating the excellence of human greatness, turned men away to the making of idols; and this superstitious custom, after continuing for a long period, is handed down to the majority as if it were natural and true. It is the part of a lover of man, or rather of a lover of God, to remind men who have neglected it of that which they ought to know. For the truth is of itself sufficient to show forth, by means of those things which are contained under the pole of heaven, the order [instituted by] Him who has created them. But forgetfulness having taken possession of the minds of men, through the long-suffering of God, has acted recklessly in transferring to mortals the name which is applicable to the only true God; and from the few the infection of sin spread to the many, who were blinded by popular usage to the knowledge of that which was lasting and unchangeable. For the men of former generations, who instituted private and public rites in honour of such as were more powerful, caused forgetfulness of the Catholic faith to take possession of their posterity; but I, as I have just stated, along with a God-loving mind, shall employ the speech of one who loves man, and set it before those who have intelligence, which all ought to have who are privileged to observe the administration of the universe, so that they should worship unchangeably Him who knows all things. This I shall do, not by mere display of words, but by altogether using demonstration drawn from the old poetry in Greek literature, and from writings very common amongst all. For from these the famous men who have handed down idol-worship as law to the multitudes, shall be taught and convicted by their own poets and literature of great ignorance.
P. 68, D, [cap. 30.]
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter IV.—God desires not sacrifices, but righteousness., editorial note cite_note-12 · Original source
Again, Plato, in Timæus, says: “But if any one on consideration should actually institute a rigid inquiry, he would be ignorant of the distinction between the human and the divine nature; because God mingles many things up into one, [and again is able to dissolve one into many things,] seeing that He is endued with knowledge and power; but no man either is, or ever shall be, able to perform any of these.”
κακά in Euripedes, καλά in text.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter V.—The vain pretensions of false gods., editorial note cite_note-14 · Original source
“But in the daughter of Erechtheus What interest have I? for that pertains Not unto such as me. But when I come With golden vessels for libations, I The dew shall sprinkle, and yet needs must warn Apollo of his deeds; for when he weds Maidens by force, the children secretly Begotten he betrays, and then neglects When dying. Thus not you; but while you may Always pursue the virtues, for the gods Will surely punish men of wickedness. How is it right that you, who have prescribed Laws for men’s guidance, live unrighteously? But ye being absent, I shall freely speak, And ye to men shall satisfaction give For marriage forced, thou Neptune, Jupiter, Who over heaven presides. The temples ye Have emptied, while injustice ye repay. And though ye laud the prudent to the skies, Yet have ye filled your hands with wickedness. No longer is it right to call men ill If they do imitate the sins of gods; Nay, evil let their teachers rather be.”
These lines are assigned to Diphilus.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter V.—The vain pretensions of false gods., editorial note cite_note-16 · Original source
And Menander in Diphilus:—
See chap. i., the opening sentence.
Editorial footnote · On the Sole Government of God, Chapter VI.—We should acknowledge one only God., editorial note cite_note-18 · Original source
Here, then, is a proof of virtue, and of a mind loving prudence, to recur to the communion of the unity, and to attach one’s self to prudence for salvation, and make choice of the better things according to the free-will placed in man; and not to think that those who are possessed of human passions are lords of all, when they shall not appear to have even equal power with men. For in Homer, Demodocus says he is self-taught —